J-Log.eu - Forum JLF ------ SPAM Bots! Bitte nach Registrierung eine Email an mich zur Freischaltung! / After registration drop me an email please for clearing! ===Nenne/name the NICK you used to register with!=== Email address: -> http://j-log.eu/impressum 2012-12-16T22:46:46+01:00 http://j-log.eu/forum/feed.php?f=4&t=263 2012-12-16T22:46:46+01:00 2012-12-16T22:46:46+01:00 http://j-log.eu/forum/viewtopic.php?t=263&p=3189#p3189 <![CDATA[Re: Neuordnung der Firmwares, Version 4.0.0]]>

Statistik: Verfasst von czyno — 16. Dez 2012, 22:46


]]>
2012-12-16T22:22:53+01:00 2012-12-16T22:22:53+01:00 http://j-log.eu/forum/viewtopic.php?t=263&p=3186#p3186 <![CDATA[Re: Neuordnung der Firmwares, Version 4.0.0]]>
Okay, I will change that in the firmware to avoid negative values.

The negative current values are real, they're coming from the CC.
On the other hand I never saw negative values before and I am sure that also you will not see them in real flights.
The negative current values are due to that on/off that you have practiced and with no load.

Statistik: Verfasst von dl7uae — 16. Dez 2012, 22:22


]]>
2012-12-16T22:17:25+01:00 2012-12-16T22:17:25+01:00 http://j-log.eu/forum/viewtopic.php?t=263&p=3184#p3184 <![CDATA[Re: Neuordnung der Firmwares, Version 4.0.0]]> Normal and not normal ;D But that is the reason of my peaks in current on receiver display.

Statistik: Verfasst von czyno — 16. Dez 2012, 22:17


]]>
2012-12-16T22:07:28+01:00 2012-12-16T22:07:28+01:00 http://j-log.eu/forum/viewtopic.php?t=263&p=3181#p3181 <![CDATA[Re: Neuordnung der Firmwares, Version 4.0.0]]> Statistik: Verfasst von dl7uae — 16. Dez 2012, 22:07


]]>
2012-12-16T22:00:31+01:00 2012-12-16T22:00:31+01:00 http://j-log.eu/forum/viewtopic.php?t=263&p=3179#p3179 <![CDATA[Re: Neuordnung der Firmwares, Version 4.0.0]]> Oh, one thing - In HoTT Manager values are not negative...values are positive - 6533,5A ;)

Statistik: Verfasst von czyno — 16. Dez 2012, 22:00


]]>
2012-12-16T21:28:38+01:00 2012-12-16T21:28:38+01:00 http://j-log.eu/forum/viewtopic.php?t=263&p=3174#p3174 <![CDATA[Re: Neuordnung der Firmwares, Version 4.0.0]]>
Set to your motor's pole number and also the gear ratio. The latter is no problem because we're logging TWO speeds, rpmMOTOR AND rpmROTOR.

Statistik: Verfasst von dl7uae — 16. Dez 2012, 21:28


]]>
2012-12-16T21:20:52+01:00 2012-12-16T21:20:52+01:00 http://j-log.eu/forum/viewtopic.php?t=263&p=3172#p3172 <![CDATA[Re: Neuordnung der Firmwares, Version 4.0.0]]> There are a lot of negative values of Imot ;) I can see it now in Graupner HoTT Manager.

Best

Statistik: Verfasst von czyno — 16. Dez 2012, 21:20


]]>
2012-12-16T20:29:46+01:00 2012-12-16T20:29:46+01:00 http://j-log.eu/forum/viewtopic.php?t=263&p=3160#p3160 <![CDATA[Re: Neuordnung der Firmwares, Version 4.0.0]]>
Only:

- RPM is going crazy during spool-up. Looks like it comes from the CC itself.

- RPM motor is a little high.. What pole number is setup by JLC?
(Please attach your CONFIG.txt.)

- The gear ratio isn't set yet in JLC (-> rpmUni - head speed).

- Capacity is looking very strange because of some negative(!) records for Imot. (Think I should force to unsigned integer.)
(Because of these short jumps in throttle negative current values appeared in between (pulse distance <500us).)

No, there is no step, nowhere, as well as not for Imot.
The CC will have a resolution (discrete pulse distance) of course.
Everything below 10 amps is rather inaccurate as it comes from the CC.

Statistik: Verfasst von dl7uae — 16. Dez 2012, 20:29


]]>
2012-12-16T19:58:12+01:00 2012-12-16T19:58:12+01:00 http://j-log.eu/forum/viewtopic.php?t=263&p=3159#p3159 <![CDATA[Re: Neuordnung der Firmwares, Version 4.0.0]]>
Current is logged by JLog with 1A step? On transmiter display there are still peeks of current >500A. Conections are without any loops.

Statistik: Verfasst von czyno — 16. Dez 2012, 19:58


]]>
2012-12-16T19:24:03+01:00 2012-12-16T19:24:03+01:00 http://j-log.eu/forum/viewtopic.php?t=263&p=3158#p3158 <![CDATA[Re: Neuordnung der Firmwares, Version 4.0.0]]>
CU

Statistik: Verfasst von dl7uae — 16. Dez 2012, 19:24


]]>
2012-12-16T19:03:39+01:00 2012-12-16T19:03:39+01:00 http://j-log.eu/forum/viewtopic.php?t=263&p=3157#p3157 <![CDATA[Re: Neuordnung der Firmwares, Version 4.0.0]]> Strange. After that there were no problems with data. I will test it tommorow or day after tommorow. If will be no rain I will fly.

Best

Statistik: Verfasst von czyno — 16. Dez 2012, 19:03


]]>
2012-12-16T19:00:28+01:00 2012-12-16T19:00:28+01:00 http://j-log.eu/forum/viewtopic.php?t=263&p=3156#p3156 <![CDATA[Re: Neuordnung der Firmwares, Version 4.0.0]]> Statistik: Verfasst von dl7uae — 16. Dez 2012, 19:00


]]>
2012-12-16T18:54:12+01:00 2012-12-16T18:54:12+01:00 http://j-log.eu/forum/viewtopic.php?t=263&p=3155#p3155 <![CDATA[Re: Neuordnung der Firmwares, Version 4.0.0]]> VersioInfo - 4.0.0CC_H4-72.1
I will se what I have in Castle logs ;)

Statistik: Verfasst von czyno — 16. Dez 2012, 18:54


]]>
2012-12-16T18:50:20+01:00 2012-12-16T18:50:20+01:00 http://j-log.eu/forum/viewtopic.php?t=263&p=3154#p3154 <![CDATA[Re: Neuordnung der Firmwares, Version 4.0.0]]>
Up to 17% of PWM, 70 amps peak by fast transition of PWM 0-->17%.

44A at 5% PWM..

A bit high, isn't it?
And if I look at temperature (°C), -19, -22, -26, .... can't be.

What do you find in the file "CCinfo.txt", what in "version.txt"?

It seems to me that the pulse length calibration did not work for any reason..
(The time base of both devices will differ. So at least one of the pulses of the CC (data type) is taken as calibration item.)

Statistik: Verfasst von dl7uae — 16. Dez 2012, 18:50


]]>
2012-12-16T18:37:12+01:00 2012-12-16T18:37:12+01:00 http://j-log.eu/forum/viewtopic.php?t=263&p=3153#p3153 <![CDATA[Re: Neuordnung der Firmwares, Version 4.0.0]]> I will rebiuld my model to test JLog. GAM will wait for its better time.

My short log file is included.

Statistik: Verfasst von czyno — 16. Dez 2012, 18:37


]]>